Sunday, May 3, 2015

REVIEW OF METAL INJECTION MOLDING EMPLOYING PLASTIC RAPID PROTOTYPE TOOLING (TEKNOLOGI NANO II)

Ini adalah teknologi yang berkembang sekarang ini di dunia industri yaitu metalurgi serbuk. dalam metalurgi serbuk ini banyak material baru yang dapat di buat seperti halnya teknologi mutakhir adalah Teknologi Nano

Introduction
Prototypes is use for many reason. One of important reason is we can use it or to know it physically before we are going to produce it in mass production.

One problem is : if we make a prototype with unique and complicated (artistic) by using CNC, or Conventional Machine is need more time and much money. So in that reason we can use Rapid Prototype (RP).
Background 
RP can be reduce cost about 70% and time 90 % (Waterman, N., and P. Dickens, 1994). Many way of RP can be done such as :
Laminated Object Manufacture (LOM)
Selective Laser Sintering (SLS)
Ink Jet Printing (IJP)
Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM)
Stereo Lithography (SL)
In 1980’s Powder metallurgy is grow up in manufacturing.(German et. al.)
There are three technique for doing this field :
a. Metal injection molding (MIM);
b. Powder injection molding (PIM);
c. Slurry casting (SC).
Metal injection molding begins by taking a fine metal powder, or combination of, and mixing it with a binder. Polymers and waxes are commonly used, in small quantities, to form and feedstock that can then be shaped through injection molding under high pressure(German et. al.; Liu, Z., et.al.).

Powder injection molding (PIM) is similar to MIM. The reason it is not included under the same definition is because it also may involve ceramics. (German, R. M.2011 , German, et.al. 1997, Randall M. et.al. 2005)
Slurry casting is a technique employing wax molds to cast slurries of either metal or ceramic powders. The molds are usually produced using technique called Mold Shape Deposition Manufacturing (MoldSDM).

Result and discussion
PEG (polyethylene glycol) And Lanolin Mixtures
  Prior to mixing a feedstock, 2.04g of PEG and 1.02g of lanolin were heated on a hot plate set to 150⁰C. Both substances melted. After agitation, both substances mixed well and showed no signs of separation once agitation was stopped.
Crayola Crayon
  Crayola brand crayons were used 2 formulations. Using the same technique to mix binders and add powder as mentioned for previous mixtures, the solution was brought to a temperature of 110⁰C on a 200⁰C hot plate.


Discussion
1. Use water: To concern about feedstock temperature 200 C.
2.  Use Wax (BW and CW) As more powder was added to the feedstock to increase the solids loading, ejection became a concern.


Conclusion
1. RP can be use for making molding in fast time, however if it is use in MIM, should be concern in feedstock and low pressure.
2. Slurry way should be determined was that the balance between feedstock viscosity, solids loading and debinding aptitude require careful formulation.
3. The greatest success was achieved via the carbonyl iron, gas-atomized, spherical, 2μm average-particle-size powder. When mixed with a binder based upon a 70% beeswax and 30% carnauba wax formulation at 110⁰C, the feedstock facilitates pouring directly into a RP mold heated to 85⁰C.
Recommendation of future work should include the following:
Alteration of feedstock through the direct addition of carbon
Alloying of feedstock with nickel, cobalt, or molybdenum in addition to the further exploration of different metals such as tungsten, brass, stainless steels, and copper.
Experiment with additional waxes to reduce the temperature required to pour the feedstock and debind the feedstock thereby optimizing time from conceptto-part.
Sintering with the addition of a carbon-rich or nitrogen atmosphere for improved strength.
Heat treatment
Debinding in a modified kiln with the addition of an nitrogen atmosphere.

1. Waterman, N., and P. Dickens. "Rapid product development in the USA, Europe and Japan." World Class Design to Manufacture 1, no. 3 (1994): 27-36.
2. German, Randall M., and Animesh Bose. Injection Molding of Metals and Ceramics. New Jersey: Metal Powders Industries Federation, 1997.
3. German, R. M. Powder Injection Molding. Unpublished Course Material, San Diego: San Diego State University, 2011
4. Liu, Z., N. Loh, S. Tor, and K. Khor. "Characterization of Powder Injection Molding Feedstock." Materials Characterization 49, issue 2-3 (2003): 313-320. doi: 10.1016/S0167-577X(00)00151-8.
5. Randall M. German. Powdered Metallurgy & Particulate Materials Processing. New Jersey: Metal Powders Industries Federation, 2005.
6. Youtube, 2012, about MIM

No comments:

Post a Comment